Grand Orient of the United States of America announced

topic posted Mon, November 26, 2007 - 7:14 AM by 
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Interesting... anyone know anything about it ?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Sunday evening the website of the United Grand Lodge of America was updated to reflect a new status, a new focus, and a new order of amity with worldwide Freemasonry.

The UGLA is now officially the Grand Orient of the United States of America. After months of discussion, the organization is now in amity with the Grand Orient de France and through them, with George Washington Union and Freemasons across the world.

The Grand Orient de France is the largest Masonic organization in France, and was formed in 1733. It was the only Masonic Order in France until the end of the 19th century. Its members outnumber all other French grand lodges combined.

The new Grand Orient of the United States of America's website says:
LIBERTY — FRATERNITY — EQUALITY

The Grand Orient of the United States of America is a continuation of the Masonic traditions began by brothers such as Benjamin Franklin and the Marquis De Lafayette. Our lineage can be traced back through the Grand Orient of France to the original speculative Grand Lodge of London that was established in 1717. These traditions and ideas are at the very core of Enlightenment thinking that eventually resulted in the freedoms enjoyed by every American today.

We hold true to these beliefs:
That every man is endowed with certain inalienable rights
That peace and harmony among human beings is only possible where there exists a separation between church and state
That absolute freedom of conscience is an essential element in the pursuit of happiness among all peoples
That all human beings are created equal and that equality is fundamental to democracy and freedom
What is today the Grand Orient of the United States of America began on December 27th, 2005; several lodges declared their independence from the 'Antient' Masonic system and formed a confederation of sovereign lodges under the banner of United Grand Lodge of America. In so doing, they sought to restore Modern Free-Masonry to the American continent and return to the traditional Enlightenment and cosmopolitan ideals expressed in the original Craft. This event allowed the original streams of Masonic thought still existing in Europe to once again flow freely into lodges in America.

In November of 2007, several more lodges declared their independence from the 'Antient' Masonic system and the Council of the Order was convened to formalize our relationship with our brethren in France and throughout Europe. The Council voted unanimously to change the name of the United Grand Lodge of America to the Grand Orient of the United States of America to better and more precisely identify it with the existing currents of Modern Free-Masonry throughout the world.

The Grand Orient of the United States of America is a masculine Masonic obedience that works together with the mixed-gender obedience lodges operating under George Washington Union throughout the United States. Together, these two systems represent the most liberal and progressive form of Freemasonry in America, which is open to all people regardless of race, creed, or sex.

Our aim is the brotherhood of all humanity through a universal chain of union extending around the globe. If you are already with us in spirit then you are welcome to join with us in Masonic lodges throughout the world.
www.burningtaper.blogspot.com/
posted by:
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Their web site is a bit thin...
    grandorientusa.org/

    I had never considered a "Grand Orient" in the States before...
    • OH!
      There is a few.. bessel.org/glsusa.htm
      • Speaking as a member of a lodge in PA named to honor Ben Franklin who is a PGM of PA he had nothing to do with a UGLA or Grand Orient. I know it's spliting hairs and that perhaps recognizing all masons should be the norm but since we don't recognize a Grand Orient of America that I know of I would have to say leave Ben Franklin out of your story.

        I know you were just posting info Bloke and it is interesting but I hate to see things misrepresented to those who do not know better.
        • I saw that too Jimmy but I mainly posted it for masons – and assumed it would scream at them… but you’re right – many may not know.. …

          It has been written by a spin doctor ..

          “The Grand Orient of the United States of America is a continuation of the Masonic traditions began by brothers such as Benjamin Franklin and the Marquis De Lafayette.”

          trying to claim some sort of historical legitimacy by inferring that Benjamin Franklin was tied up in a Grand Orient rather than the actual Regular Grand Lodge.

          If I started a Grand Orient in Melbourne today – I could make that claim.. it does not mean that those guys would want to masonically associate with me nor that my Grand Orient was a direct linear masonic decent from one of their lodges..…

          This always happens.. Hell – think of some of the things said when the Ancients and Moderns were vying to organisational supremacy in the 1700 & 1800’s !

          Thanks again

          Hey – it does show up one frequent subconscious factor in Masonic thinking – if it is old – it must be good… if it is new – it must be bad.. The old “my lodge was founded in 1734 and has a proud history”.. that’s nice and is of interest and something to be proud of – and another more important test is

          “Do you actually try to live as Freemasons and when you get together - how much fun is it ?”

          (and part of that is respect - and no disrespect intended to GO and other “unrecognised” members who read this..)
          • Yeah it gets kind of funny when dealing with "masons" who are not reconized by your jurisdiction. Do you consider them masons? Where do you draw the line. He in cyber space we meet on a level of sort but we have to be warry of every person we meet. There may be some fine people in the Grand Orient or in CoMasonry but the still can't vist my lodge and I am not going to invite them. I will however discuss whatever differences I can and ideas they have. Masonry is about learning.
            • Unsu...
               
              jimmy, we all know your feelings about 'real masons' as opposed to us profane cowans.

              go Illuminati!!
              • Ali – Please don’t bait members for I suspect they will stop posting here and the tribe will be less for it.. There are not enough people posting here as it is.. They go to other places to avoid such comments.. You have the right to your opinion – but please don’t use it to try to incite conflict or diminish others.

                If you read Jimmy’s post – he is asking for personal comment from masons on this issue in a spirit of learning and sharing. I think your shot at Jim adds nothing to this conversation. Nothing at all! If this tribe goes the way of personal attacks and interaction lacking mutual respect - I will either ask the moderator to warm the perpetrator with the view of banning them if they continue in the same way – or leave myself.

                <<Yeah it gets kind of funny when dealing with "masons" who are not recognized by your jurisdiction. Do you consider them masons?>>

                Partly. I consider them “masons” – including the women – if they observe the same landmarks. However they don’t have the Masonic rights of an newbie and I would certainly treat them as cowans in respect to “secrets” and “ritual”.. Like any non-masonic visitor to a social lodge function – I would treat them with respect and courtesy – and also except I might share some common interests with them :) I would expect them to treat me the same – for masonically, neither of us has any official standing in each others Jurisdictions as masons..

                Being from a Regular Masonic Body – I certainly cannot sit in their lodges and they can’t sit in mine because in doing so I would break the rules not to masonically associate with “clandestine bodies” and their members. These rules are there to protect our “secrets” and also the integrity of our practises which may be different from those in “clandestine bodies” When it comes to entry of a lodge – masons not recognized by my jurisdiction have no right of entry. However, just like all of my family for example, this does not mean I would not associate with them. As any friend I would enjoy their company and respect them as people both of merit and character.. They may also have lessons for me :)

                In all instances – whether ‘Regular” or “Irregular” I guard modes of recognition, ritual, and the like with great caution until I have “proved” those in my company have the right to them.

                I think one of the things people who are not masons miss in this is that there is a big difference between “associate” and “masoncially associate”. Just because someone cannot sit in lodge with me does not mean we cannot be friends..

                That's my spin on this issue Jimmy..
                • Ali you are a fool.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     
                    you are correct, sir.

                    i am a fool of the most sublime order.

                    yet i don't spend a minute of my day worrying about who "is" or "isn't"



                    i still have yet to hear a decent answer regarding the UGLE, it's initial constitution, and how it defines/denies lodges.
                    it doesn't even play by it's own rules.
                    'masonry' exists without it.

                    so who is 'real' and who is 'free' ... is still quite a matter of debate.

                    for those of us who can do so.
                    • <<yet i don't spend a minute of my day worrying about who "is" or "isn't" >>

                      The simple response is you don't have to worry about these things unless your a member of an organisation that requires you to do so.

                      As I understand you are neither a member of a regular nor irregular body - I would imagine it is even less significant to you Ali

                      There are many web sites and books covering the topic and the history of Lodges formed in "The Ancient Way", the conflict between "Ancient" , "Moderns" and Irregularity. Me adding to them would take a lot of effort to do what has already been done. And as is often the case - the view taken is very subjective depending on what you belong to and your POV.

                      Above all I know this - I am a member of a "Regular Body" which prohibits masonic association with "Irregular" and "Clandestine" bodies but also know that within those groups some interesting stuff happens and some interesting research is done.

                      If part Freemasonry is about preserving traditions of practise, ritual, and history, and you accept that the best way to preserve this is by uniformity through central organisations known as "Grand Lodges" - it become important to acknowledge that adherence to these practises recognised and preserved through GLs are important and is important "now" - regardless of entering a debate on the legitimacy and history of how we got to that point particularly in the 1700's and 1800's. For me as a Mason - what really matters is "now" but I like having and awareness of how we got to "now" and the interesting and sometimes turbulent history of the Craft...

                      If I am wrong in this - well, I can accept that. It would not be the first time I have been wrong. I am only human..

                      Anyway - having a look at this thread - congratulations Ali - you stifled it in you initial response to Jimmy. So your attitude puts us further away from being able to have a conversation about this here - and I find that being disappointing especially as the couple of Private Messages I have received about this indicate there was some interest on the topic. You put yourself further away from getting the answers you sought.
                      • Unsu...
                         
                        actually, bloke, i think you've finally given me something to chew on. every other time i've asked that question, i've only been ignored. it just seems very odd to me that there can be an 'official' lodge that claims a monopoly on the creation of lodges - when there would have to be an initial creation of the grand lodge (by irregular/clandestine lodges, if you use the USGL definition...)

                        guess i have some more research to do... nothing new there.

                        and as for stopping the thread, my apologies... but as far as i saw, it was just a rehash of jimmy's position on 'real masons' v 'fake masons' or whatever that means...

                        <<The simple response is you don't have to worry about these things unless your a member of an organisation that requires you to do so. >>

                        i didn't realise that exclusion was such a big part of belonging to a lodge. i've never heard any mason so concerned with status. then again, maybe they just never expressed that to me - how would i know? all i do know is from my interactions with masons of various degrees... i even worked with a 32nd several times ... and never once did i get the vibe from them that i was somehow intruding - they seemed to like that i was even interested and could have a decent conversation about such things... jimmy is the only person i've ever run into that is so exclusionary ... or at worst is the only one honest about it.


                        as for just randomly creating a 'grand lodge' ... isn't anyone concerned with who is running the show and where the money is being funneled? that's always my first question. look at the oto mess.

                        • <<<it just seems very odd to me that there can be an 'official' lodge that claims a monopoly on the creation of lodges - when there would have to be an initial creation of the grand lodge (by irregular/clandestine lodges, if you use the USGL definition...)>>

                          Not Really. A Grand Lodge only has that Authority because the Masons who comprise it VESTED it with the Authority. Remember the meaning of the word "Lodge" above- it is a group of masons - and not something like a company - without the men (and/or woman) it is nothing. All Lodges here are represented at Grand Lodge in a much more meaningful way than say a "Parliament" in practice and in voting rights as a ratio of the entire masonic population. The Grand Lodge System is a good one. This Vestment of Authority by masons in a GL was true when UGLE was created - but the problem was that the majority of masons at the time did not vest it with that authority - and it was really a fairly new model and idea. Indeed some Lodges which existed at time continued to operate alone for a long time after UGLE was founded. If memory serves me right - there are still some that do.. .Many 'regular" masons in remote places started working without Official Recognition and worked while it arrived - even initiating candidates - this was especially true in the 1700 & 1800's... For administration and uniformity of practise and rules - a Grand Lodge makes perfect sense..

                          "Exclusion" is different from "Irregular". Exclusion is when you have been initiated and are a in a Regular Body (or Irregular I guess) and get denied rights of being in a Lodge due to misconduct. It does not happen regularly - and the most common reason is non-payment of membership fees. Like many organizations - you cannot fully partake of its "services" without financial membership... oh and if your interested GL Fees here are about $90 AUD per annum - so it is hardly sheep stations..

                          The only person I have ever seen in tribe who was accused of being a "fake" mason was someone who held they were a mason but had never been initiated into either a recognized regular nor irregular body - and I would agree that such a person is holding themselves out as being something they are not - and hence "fake". If that person cannot understand that they have a very poor understanding of all generally accepted views, both regular and irregular , of what "Freemasonry" is.. Please find the post where Jimmy said someone was a "fake" mason and used that specific word... If you join the "True Ancient Masonic Keepers of Light' (name made up) which was founded in 1980 by non-masons who are not even a close facsimile in practise and values of a "Recognised Lodge" - you cannot claim to be a "Freemason" - yet some people do... Golden Dawn is a good example.

                          Ancient Free and Accepted Masonry (ie "the Craft") only has three degrees.. Descriptions from 32 Degree "Masons" about their appendant bodies is quiet interesting - but has no real bearing on "The Craft".. They have no special standing in the Craft. Indeed I could "outrank" a 33 Degree Mason both in my Lodge and at Grand Lodge (which I have the right to site in). However you will normally (but certainly not always) find such masons are very experienced in the Craft as well.. As we always say - "Freemasonry" is a label that can be widely applied. Oh - and how can we have "ranks" when we belief in equality? Simple. "Rank" is usually attached to a job - and hence rank is not (or certainly should) about Status - it should and is about responsibilities and duties - but you do continue to hold many "ranks" after you serve your time in that office to indicate you have served in it.. This also qualified you to hold positions of increased responsibility that require more experience, knowledge and (hopefully) demonstrated ability.

                          One of the problem with talking about masonry is that it is hard to explain. And bits of it may even sound silly. Also what is indeed regarded as a "secret" can be a little unclear and hence people don't talk about it. Furthermore - often people do not listen and want to be believe in fantasy .. It is a little bit like people calling you a werewolf because you happen to have beard.. It can get very frustration because people get totally fixated on untruths.. I am sick of delusional folks using "Freemason" and "Aliens" in the once sentence ! Sheeeze !

                          Another problem - is that questions breed questions. I consider i know a bit about Freemasonry - but when I talk to someone who knows a lot (or just a lot of detail about a certain section of Freemasonry ) - I too am full of questions - but they are built upon a lot of knowledge... Questions are an inevitable part of being a Freemason. Without giving offense - I would describe the legitimacy of GL as a very rudimentary question..

                          Yet another problem is that personal opinion is often represented and accepted as fact. Indeed there are probably things I have said in this post that other Masons may well object to and offer good argument against - treating everything with caution is a wise way to go - and be very carefully as to the source of the information as it will influence both content and POV.

                          If you're interested - simply look up Freemasonry on wikipedia. Whenever I visit that article (and it has not been temporary vandalised) - it seems to be very good and carried a discussion (and additional links) about Moderns, Ancients and Regularity.

                          I don't know much about the OTO - but as I don't think it has the requirement of being a Master Mason to be a member - I cant see it is within the scope of this tribe. I am not sure if it has any standing in Australia either as a regular, irregular or clandestine body but I could be wrong in that. Certainly - OTO hardly gets a "bleep" on my radar...

                          Cheers

                          Bloke

  • There may or may not be a connection here, but a former roomie of mine offered to initiate me in the Grand Orient Lodge tradition she had acquired from this fellow:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bertiaux
    While I have a long-standing interest in Freemasonry, I was at the time both an atheist and an irreligious libertine in every sense of the words (mostly retired, thank you very much). I also didn't think a fraternal order which accepted voodoo priestesses (a tradition she acquired from the same source) was particularly fraternal. I figured any club which would have me as a member in that state wasn't a group of people I wanted to know better, so I declined.

    I don't know anything about this weblog-group, but what they write about is pretty consistent with being from the Bertiaux line.

    FWIIW, the roomie, despite the eccentric interests, was and remains a sterling individual.
    • 1) There is NO Grand Lodge, Grand Orient, Grand YahYah of the United States I would recognize. Each state is it's own Jurisdiction and speaks only for it's Jurisdiction.

      2) The Grand Lodge of England, is the only Grand Lodge of a country " I " know to be legitimate and all "regular" lodges trace back their charters or warrants to it.

      3) I am not Sexist but I do not accept Co-Masonry. You will not see me in a Sorority so I will not sit in an open lodge with a woman.

      That is just my 3 cents.
  • GOOFUS is a completely bogus organization that only exists in the minds of a handful of internet personalities, and primarily in the mind of one expelled Mason from Georgia.

    This organization has no charter, is not authorized or recognized by the GOdF, and quite frankly is nothing more than a fraud being perpetrated on those unsuspecting souls who come to the interenet, hoping, gambling on finding some, if any credible information about the Masonic fraternity.

    If you are interested in researching this further, or pursuing information that is credible from the Masonic fraternity, then I suggest you visit the only Masonic discussion forum out there, for Regular Masons, by Regular Masons, www.thesanctumsanctorum.com or visit Ed King's Masonic Information for indepth details.

    For those of you here who are regular Masons, know that those behind the GOOFUS effort are expelled and clandestine Masons and have no regard for the damage that they are doing to the image of the fraternity with their actions.

    Guard the West Gate of your Lodge.
    • <<For those of you here who are regular Masons, know that those behind the GOOFUS effort are expelled and clandestine Masons and have no regard for the damage that they are doing to the image of the fraternity with their actions. >>

      Respectfully, I think the Word "Orient " would have made it pretty clear what their origins and position in regards to regularity were.....

Recent topics in "Freemasons"